Strength of reinforced block structures for civil infrastructure protection

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33271/crpnmu/86.264

Keywords:

block masonry, construction materials, GFRP reinforcement, glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars, civil infrastructure, emergencies, out-of-plane bending, impulse loading, dynamic amplification factor

Abstract

Purpose. To establish quantitative relationships between block-wall geometry, GFRP bar spacing, flexural capacity, and the limiting short-duration transverse load for preliminary design of protective civil infrastructure structures.

The methods. A 1 m wide equivalent one-way wall strip under out-of-plane bending was analysed. Capacity was determined from equilibrium and strain compatibility, cracked-section stiffness by the transformed-section method, and impulse response by a first-mode single-degree-of-freedom model. Parametric calculations were performed for wall thicknesses of 190, 240, and 290 mm and Ø12 mm GFRP bars at 300, 200, and 150 mm spacing.

Findings. For the reference wall, h = 190 mm with Ø12 mm GFRP bars at 200 mm spacing, the nominal bending moment was Mn = 36.27 kN·m/m, the design moment MR = 23.58 kN·m/m, and the equivalent static pressure pR,st = 32.75 kPa. The first-mode period of the cracked strip was T1 = 0.102 s. For 10, 20, and 40 ms rectangular impulses, the calculated pressure levels were 53.93, 28.30, and 17.35 kPa. Increasing wall thickness to 240 and 290 mm at 200 mm spacing increased pR,st to 51.36 and 72.80 kPa.

The originality. A coupled analytical relationship links the resistance of a reinforced block section with dynamic response through the first-mode period of the cracked wall. Increasing GFRP reinforcement raises flexural resistance and changes the natural period; therefore, reducing bar spacing has a nonlinear effect under short impulses.

Practical implementation. The relationships can be used for preliminary selection of block-wall thickness and GFRP spacing in protective civil infrastructure structures. The method does not replace certification tests, nonlinear finite-element analysis, or checks of anchorage, bond, fire resistance, and local failure.

References

1. Мельник, М., Мельник, І., Панченко, О., & Собко, Ю. (2026). Огляд способів підсилення мурованих конструкцій високоміцними композитами. Будівельні конструкції. Теорія і практика, 18, 216–228. https://doi.org/10.32347/2522-4182.18.2026.216-228

2. Gilstrap, J. M., & Dolan, C. W. (1998). Out-of-plane bending of FRP-reinforced masonry walls. Composites Science and Technology, 58(8), 1277–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00007-4

3. Galati, N., Tumialan, G. J., & Nanni, A. (2006). Strengthening with FRP bars of URM walls subject to out-of-plane loads. Construction and Building Materials, 20(1–2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.047

4. Tumialan, J. G., Galati, N., & Nanni, A. (2003). Fiber-reinforced polymer strengthening of unreinforced masonry walls subject to out-of-plane loads. ACI Structural Journal, 100(3), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.14359/12607

5. Gattesco, N., & Boem, I. (2017). Out-of-plane behavior of reinforced masonry walls: Experimental and numerical study. Composites Part B: Engineering, 128, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.006

6. Kashani, H. K., Shakiba, M., Bazli, M., Hosseini, S. M., Mortazavi, S. M. R., & Arashpour, M. (2023). The structural response of masonry walls strengthened using prestressed near surface mounted GFRP bars under cyclic loading. Materials and Structures, 56, Article 112. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-023-02201-0

7. Alsayed, S. H., Elsanadedy, H. M., Al-Zaheri, Z. M., Al-Salloum, Y. A., & Abbas, H. (2016). Blast response of GFRP-strengthened infill masonry walls. Construction and Building Materials, 115, 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.053

8. Badshah, E., Naseer, A., Ashraf, M., Shah, F., & Akhtar, K. (2017). Review of blast loading models, masonry response, and mitigation. Shock and Vibration, 2017, Article 6708341. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6708341

9. Bui, T. T., & Limam, A. (2014). Out-of-plane behaviour of hollow concrete block masonry walls unstrengthened and strengthened with CFRP composite. Composites Part B: Engineering, 67, 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.006

10. American Concrete Institute, Committee 440. (2022). Building code requirements for structural concrete reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars—Code and commentary (ACI CODE-440.11-22). https://www.concrete.org/store/productdetail.aspx?ItemID=44011U22

&Language=English&Units=US_Units

11. ASTM International. (2022). Standard specification for solid round glass fiber reinforced polymer bars for concrete reinforcement (ASTM D7957/D7957M-22). https://doi.org/10.1520/D7957_D7957M-22

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Section

CONSTRUCTION AND CIVIL ENGINEERING